samo teoretski....mozda google earth ima snimke iz svemira, tog dana kada je antonija nestala? mozda se na satelitskoj snimci (ako se to cuva) vidjeti nekoga ??? inace ih ovaj psihopat ovako mjesecima moze vozati. malo jedan most pa malo drugi.....

stvarno svaka cast i hvala policiji na poslu koji obavlja ali i susjednim drzavama koje ovako pomazu. ali ja imam pitanje: NIJE LI OVA POTRAGA TISUCU PUTA SKUPLJA OD AUTOBUSNE LINIJE KOJA JE MOGLA BITI UVEZENA U TAJ KRAJ gdje je cura stopirala? i nije li pametnije iz ovoga nauciti da se ipak malo vise novaca treba ulagati i slati u nerazvijenije krajeve?

zar jos nisu tamo napravili zastitnu ogradu???? pa koliki su vec padali na istom mjestu! on niti je prvi nit ce biti zadnji koji je pao i ubio se. samo nek se bol nada da ga njegova obitelj nece tuziti jer nije ogradio opasno podrucje koje obilazi itekako puno turista.

ne kuzim ove kr****ske komentare. kao prvo, normalno je da ce tako veliki koncern uzeti covjeka iznutra, koji se popeo po ljestvici i dokazao. vjerojatno pocevsi na nekom jako niskom poslu. kao drugo, svaka ce firma koja pocinje u stranoj zemlji uzeti iskusnu osobu sto ovaj itekako je. to sto uci hrvatski mu je samo ogroman plus. i vi koji s****te o austrijskim firmama koje kakti ne uzimaju hrvate - u krivu ste i to debelo. bivsi direktor vip-a mislim je postao direktor austrijskog telekoma i veeeeelika faca tu u austriji. cak i ako mu njemacki nije savrsen i cak ako ima jaki akcent. znanje i sposobnost je ono sto se trazi a upravo je to hrvat boris nemsic imao i pozvan iz zagreba u bec. toliko. ja pozdravljam i dolazak ikee i konacno urazumljivanje hrvatskih vlasti sto se dozvola i slicnog tice. otvorit ce se novi poslovi a jeftini namjestaj (ili skupi, ovisno o dubini dzepa) ce postati dostupan svima.

zale se na crtice? pa zabranite ih! roditelji moraju znati kakve crtice im djeca gledaju i moraju im govoriti, na miran nacin pun ljubavi i brige, sto je za njih dobro ili nije dobro. djeca ce shvatiti.

gledah sporne izjave i sve sto je on izgovorio je bilo jasno u kontekstu ironije i malo uvrnutog smisla za humor. i to je itekako bilo jasno kao i to da on doista nije sve to zaozbiljno misiio. smijesno da jedan cannes od straha da ce izostajati olivudske zvijezde, uspijeva popustiti pod pritiskom te izbacivati ovog talentiranog otkacenjaka s nastavka festivala. mogli su mu dozvoliti da se konkretno isprica on ili njegovi agenti koji bi to pametnije srocili. odlican zakljucak ovog clanka i usporedba s polanskim te licemjerjem....

iz wikipedije, da se ne zaboravi: "Emmanuel Goldstein is a character in George Orwell's classic dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four. He is the number one enemy of the people according to Big Brother and the Party, who heads a mysterious and possibly fictitious anti-party organization called The Brotherhood. Despite being a key part of the story, he is only actually seen and heard on telescreen, and may in fact be nothing more than a useful propaganda fabrication of the Ministry of Truth. However, Goldstein's persona as an enemy of the state serves to distract, unite and focus the anger of the people of Oceania, as he is always the subject of the "Two Minutes Hate," a daily, 2-minute show beginning at 11:00 AM where a purported image of Goldstein is shown on the telescreen (a one-channel television with internal surveillance devices that cannot be turned off). Ostensibly, Goldstein also serves an important role as both a convenient scapegoat for the totalitarian regime in 1984, and justifying reason for more military buildup, surveillance and elimination of civil liberties. In the novel, Goldstein is rumoured to be a former top member of the ruling (and sole) Party who had broken away early in the movement and started an organization known as "The Brotherhood", dedicated to the fall of The Party. The novel raises but leaves unanswered the questions of whether Goldstein, "The Brotherhood," or even "Big Brother" really exist. Each member of "The Brotherhood" is required to read the book supposedly written by Goldstein, The Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivism. Each person is said to have three or four contacts at one time which are replaced as people disappear, so that if a member is captured, he can only give up three or four others. Goldstein is always the subject of the "Two Minutes Hate," a daily, 2-minute period beginning at 11:00 AM at which a purported image of Goldstein is shown on the telescreen (a one-channel television with surveillance devices in it that cannot be turned off). The reader may surmise that a political opposition to Big Brother—namely, Goldstein—was psychologically necessary in order to provide an internal enemy posing a threat to the rule of the Party; the constantly reiterated ritual of the Two Minutes Hate help ensure that popular support for and devotion towards Big Brother is continuous. It is never revealed whether Goldstein really exists. In fact, Inner Party member O'Brien adamantly refuses to reveal whether The Brotherhood truly exists when asked by Winston in the torture room: Winston: Does the Brotherhood exist? O'Brien: That, Winston, you will never know. If we choose to set you free when we have finished with you, and if you live to be ninety years old, still you will never learn whether the answer to that question is Yes or No. As long as you live it will be an unsolved riddle in your mind. Although O'Brien claims to have collaborated in writing the book himself, his statement still leaves the questions of Goldstein and the Brotherhood's existence unanswered, as it could have been an untrue statement made by O'Brien in order to manipulate Winston's thinking and break his spirit. "Goldstein is the Osama Bin Laden figure in Orwell’s novel, an extremely elusive person who is never seen, never captured, but believed by the leadership of Oceania to be still alive and hatching his conspiracies: perhaps somewhere beyond the sea, under the protection of his foreign paymasters. Since Goldstein is never captured, the battle against his crimes, treacheries, sabotages must never end." Drawing parallel's between Goldstein and Osama Bin Laden began a week after the September 11 Attacks, when professor William L. Anderson at Frostburg State University wrote a column for LewRockwell.com entitled "Osama and Goldstein". The legal scholar Cass Sunstein in his 2009 book Worst-Case Scenarios, coins what he deems the "Goldstein Effect", describing it as "the ability to intensify public concern by giving a definite face to the adversary, specifying a human source of the underlying threat."According to Sunstein, since the U.S. War on Terror has so heavily associated terrorism with Osama Bin Laden, the outrage has intensified in similar ways as displayed in 1984.

osama ili goldstein? iz wiki..."Emmanuel Goldstein is a character in George Orwell's classic dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four. He is the number one enemy of the people according to Big Brother and the Party, who heads a mysterious and possibly fictitious anti-party organization called The Brotherhood. Despite being a key part of the story, he is only actually seen and heard on telescreen, and may in fact be nothing more than a useful propaganda fabrication of the Ministry of Truth. However, Goldstein's persona as an enemy of the state serves to distract, unite and focus the anger of the people of Oceania, as he is always the subject of the "Two Minutes Hate," a daily, 2-minute show beginning at 11:00 AM where a purported image of Goldstein is shown on the telescreen (a one-channel television with internal surveillance devices that cannot be turned off). Ostensibly, Goldstein also serves an important role as both a convenient scapegoat for the totalitarian regime in 1984, and justifying reason for more military buildup, surveillance and elimination of civil liberties. In the novel, Goldstein is rumoured to be a former top member of the ruling (and sole) Party who had broken away early in the movement and started an organization known as "The Brotherhood", dedicated to the fall of The Party. The novel raises but leaves unanswered the questions of whether Goldstein, "The Brotherhood," or even "Big Brother" really exist. Each member of "The Brotherhood" is required to read the book supposedly written by Goldstein, The Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivism. Each person is said to have three or four contacts at one time which are replaced as people disappear, so that if a member is captured, he can only give up three or four others. Goldstein is always the subject of the "Two Minutes Hate," a daily, 2-minute period beginning at 11:00 AM at which a purported image of Goldstein is shown on the telescreen (a one-channel television with surveillance devices in it that cannot be turned off). The reader may surmise that a political opposition to Big Brother—namely, Goldstein—was psychologically necessary in order to provide an internal enemy posing a threat to the rule of the Party; the constantly reiterated ritual of the Two Minutes Hate help ensure that popular support for and devotion towards Big Brother is continuous. It is never revealed whether Goldstein really exists. In fact, Inner Party member O'Brien adamantly refuses to reveal whether The Brotherhood truly exists when asked by Winston in the torture room: Winston: Does the Brotherhood exist? O'Brien: That, Winston, you will never know. If we choose to set you free when we have finished with you, and if you live to be ninety years old, still you will never learn whether the answer to that question is Yes or No. As long as you live it will be an unsolved riddle in your mind. Although O'Brien claims to have collaborated in writing the book himself, his statement still leaves the questions of Goldstein and the Brotherhood's existence unanswered, as it could have been an untrue statement made by O'Brien in order to manipulate Winston's thinking and break his spirit. "Goldstein is the Osama Bin Laden figure in Orwell’s novel, an extremely elusive person who is never seen, never captured, but believed by the leadership of Oceania to be still alive and hatching his conspiracies: perhaps somewhere beyond the sea, under the protection of his foreign paymasters. Since Goldstein is never captured, the battle against his crimes, treacheries, sabotages must never end." Drawing parallel's between Goldstein and Osama Bin Laden began a week after the September 11 Attacks, when professor William L. Anderson at Frostburg State University wrote a column for LewRockwell.com entitled "Osama and Goldstein". The legal scholar Cass Sunstein in his 2009 book Worst-Case Scenarios, coins what he deems the "Goldstein Effect", describing it as "the ability to intensify public concern by giving a definite face to the adversary, specifying a human source of the underlying threat."According to Sunstein, since the U.S. War on Terror has so heavily associated terrorism with Osama Bin Laden, the outrage has intensified in similar ways as displayed in 1984. "

"Goldstein is the Osama Bin Laden figure in Orwell’s novel, an extremely elusive person who is never seen, never captured, but believed by the leadership of Oceania to be still alive and hatching his conspiracies: perhaps somewhere beyond the sea, under the protection of his foreign paymasters. Since Goldstein is never captured, the battle against his crimes, treacheries, sabotages must never end."[3] Drawing parallel's between Goldstein and Osama Bin Laden began a week after the September 11 Attacks, when professor William L. Anderson at Frostburg State University wrote a column for LewRockwell.com entitled "Osama and Goldstein".[4] The legal scholar Cass Sunstein in his 2009 book Worst-Case Scenarios, coins what he deems the "Goldstein Effect", describing it as "the ability to intensify public concern by giving a definite face to the adversary, specifying a human source of the underlying threat."[5] According to Sunstein, since the U.S. War on Terror has so heavily associated terrorism with Osama Bin Laden, the outrage has intensified in similar ways as displayed in 1984.[5]

netko tu laze.

vrijedi procitati ovaj clanak u wikipediji: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emmanuel_Goldstein Emmanuel Goldstein is a character in George Orwell's classic dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four. He is the number one enemy of the people according to Big Brother and the Party, who heads a mysterious and possibly fictitious anti-party organization called The Brotherhood. Despite being a key part of the story, he is only actually seen and heard on telescreen, and may in fact be nothing more than a useful propaganda fabrication of the Ministry of Truth. .... "Goldstein is the Osama Bin Laden figure in Orwell’s novel, an extremely elusive person who is never seen, never captured, but believed by the leadership of Oceania to be still alive and hatching his conspiracies: perhaps somewhere beyond the sea, under the protection of his foreign paymasters. Since Goldstein is never captured, the battle against his crimes, treacheries, sabotages must never end."[3] Drawing parallel's between Goldstein and Osama Bin Laden began a week after the September 11 Attacks, when professor William L. Anderson at Frostburg State University wrote a column for LewRockwell.com entitled "Osama and Goldstein".[4] The legal scholar Cass Sunstein in his 2009 book Worst-Case Scenarios, coins what he deems the "Goldstein Effect", describing it as "the ability to intensify public concern by giving a definite face to the adversary, specifying a human source of the underlying threat."[5] According to Sunstein, since the U.S. War on Terror has so heavily associated terrorism with Osama Bin Laden, the outrage has intensified in similar ways as displayed in 1984.[5]

a cime su poslali dijelove tijela na analizu. emailom? ili mozda telekinetski? tko jos vjeruje da je od ubojstva pa do potvrde DNA proslo svega nekoliko sati? znanstvenici sigurno ne.

ovo je osudjeni terorist. i ne treba mu davati ovakav prostor u ozbiljnoj novini kao sto bi to vecernjak trebao biti. i arapi koji su srusili blizance su u svojim i jos pokojim glavama: borci za slobodu. ali svatko tko je u stanju uzeti i jedan nevini zivot ne moze biti nista drugo nego UBOJICA ili TERORIST: KAD TO HRVATSKA SHVATI BITI CE U STANJU KRENUTI NAPRIJED.

ovo se cini manje vjerojatnijim od gradnje mosta za peljesac. mutna posla iz kojih bi se jedan predsjednik trebao povuci a ne odobravati. koji ce nam kukurijek kockarnice. ulazite u pametnije

koji crni amerikanci? pa zoran savicic iz banja luke zvuci kao bosanski srbin a ne ko amerikanac. to su neka mutna posla....

dutch deutsch, sve je to novinaru vecernjaka svejedno :P

presuda gotovini je presuda tudjmanu. i nista drugo. mora se ici u drugu rundu kao kod blaskica i ne dozvoliti da gotovina kao vojnik placa za ono sto mu je naredjivano. naravno da je haag politicki sud. pripada UN-u kojega smo i mi clan. a UN je poznat kao beskicmena organizacija i tako je i ovo beskicmena presuda, u duhu 'politike' koju UN vodi odnosno tudi se 'zadovoljiti' pravdu. u ovom slucaju ipak cineci nepravdu. bilo je za ocekivati max. 8 godina kako bi 'pravda' bila zadovoljena ali 24 je puno previse.....vrhunska svinjarija.

upravo je pateticno da bivsa komunyara i yugoslovenchina milan ivkosic pise ovaj tekst. i jos ponosno navodi kako je bio 'u drustvancu'. odabranom. on, koji je bivsem rezimu iz zadnjeg otvora Strazhnjice virio. sad se u otvor STRAZHNJICE utrpava gotovini. slyam od covjeka. a gotovina i ostali...mozda bude kao kod blaskica, dobije godina zatvora koliko ih je vec prosjedio. sve ostalo bi bilo prekomplicirano za masineriju od suda...

3. dio o "VELIKOM HRVATU MILANU" ivkosicu: "Za vrijeme njegovih preobrazbi bili smo svjedoci njegovih istupa u javnosti kao novinara, ali i kao glasnogovornika stranke u kojoj je bio u tom trenutku. Često je kritizirao i napadao sve što je srpsko, bez obzira o kome se radi, i u tome je imao jako puno pristaša, bez obzira bio on u pravu ili ne. Čudno je samo da on pljuje po Srbima među kojima je imao najviše prijatelja iz Beograda i Leskovca još dok je služio vojni rok u Beogradu. Još čudnije od svega je što je njegov otac u bivšim vremenima po pričama njegovih susjeda i zemljaka u Zmijavcima, nosio pravoslavni križ kad je umro kralj Petar. Otac mu je bio inače zadrti komunist i ljudi bliski obitelji Ivkošić, govore da je prokazivao naše ljude vlastima bivše Jugoslavije. Čak govore i da je bio Udbaš a jeli istina to najbolje zna on i ljudi njemu bliski… Milan Ivkošić je važio u svojoj mladosti kao pobožno dijete, još od malih nogu a čak je bio i ministrant. Čudno je u svemu tome da je te njegove pobožnosti i ljudskosti nestalo kada je otišao iz svoga rodnoga mjesta – Zmijavaca u Imotskom, mjesta s najviše političara u Hrvatskoj. Ostavio svoju majku dugi niz godina da živi na rubu gladi i neimaštini, u kući od kamena u kamenjaru, bez vode i struje. Došao bi tu i tamo, ali najviše zbog majčinog vina koje naravno nije plaćao i čiji je veliki konzument. Oni koji su ga prozivali zbog toga osjetili su svu njegovu zloću, njegovih “rodoljubivih zanovijetanja”. To se odnosi najprije na novinare Ivicu Radoša, Igora Kolovrata i Matu Bašića na kojeg je nasrnuo i fizički. Povod je bilo pisanje o Ivkošiću novinara Igora Kolovrata u Globusu prije par godina. Nakon svih tih verbalnih i za malo fizičkih obračuna, ipak je priznao da je to istina, ali kako reče Ivkošić: «malo je pretjerano bilo što se tiče partizanštine moga ćaće»! "" link na ostatak: http://jjbraddock.bloger.hr/post/rodoljubna-zanovijetanja-8211-milan-ivkosic/301461.aspx

2. dio: "Danas optužuje Tita za mnogo štošta, pa i u večerašnjoj emisiji "U sridu" gdje taj nekulturni primitivac nije dopustio Željki Antunović niti Alki Vuici doći do riječi? Poznato je i jasno, da su mnogi lešinari oko njega, u njegovo ime počinili mnoge zločine koji su pripisani njemu, plajčkali sve i obogatili se, pa čak i mnogi Hrvati, a Tito je umro bez igdje ičega, niti je išta ostavio svojim nasljednicima. Tadašnjoj Jugoslaviji je ostavio sve a dio toga, veliki dio je naslijedila i Hrvatska. Ako uspoređujemo njega s Tuđmanom, ovaj je sada optužen za zločine za vrijeme Domovinskog - oslobodilačkog rata a Tita i danas cijene više od mnogih živih svjetskih političara? ne kažem da je to ispravno ali? Tuđmanovi igrači, svi do jednoga, popljačkali su cijelu Hrvatsku, počevši od njegovih najbližih suradnika pa do rodbine i danas su među najbogatijim Hrvatima? A Ivkošić je danas veliki «Hrvat»? On koji ništa nije izgubio za vrijeme bivše države, koji nije bio zatvaran, niti netko od njgovih jer su svi odreda bili komunisti, danas se busa u prsa o Hrvatstvu? On koji se nakon raspada Jugoslavije jednostavno izgubio i tada su počela i njegova lutanja, unutarnji i vanjski nemiri, koji su vidljivi u njegovim kolumnama. Prvo je Ivkošić počeo lobirati za Koaliciju Narodnog sporazuma i nakon toga mijenja stranke i mišljenja kao čarape. Prelazeći iz jedne u drugu, svaki put tvrdi da je to prava stranka za ovaj narod, da se nema tu što razmišljati, s takvim programom i ljudima koje ih vode. U prijelaznom roku i izvan njega dolazi i odlazi iz HSLS-a, HNS-a, HSP-a još dok je bio Paraga na čelu. Promijeniti toliko timova i toliko dresova presvući u desetak godina dovoljno govori o njemu, o tekstovima koje piše, kritizirajući sve i svakoga. "

koji smrad ovaj MILAN. koja ljiga od lazljivog ljigavca. koji ulizivacki jadni tekst. fuj. tko je on koji danas toliko mrzi jugoslaviju??? "A upravo gospodin Milan Ivkošić, dugogodišnji novinar i komentator Večernjeg lista, jedan je od takvih intelektualaca, koji prije svega želi sačuvati svoj vlastiti mir i svoju guzicu i zato tvrdoglavo gazi preko svih naprijed ne osvrćući se na posljedice svojih otrovnih kolumni. Jako je čudno koliko su podijeljena mišljenja o njemu kao čovjeku i novinaru, ali opet sve to treba uzimati sa rezervom. Nesumnjivo je da on obrazovan novinar za razliku od mnogih drugih. Oni koji su pratili njegovo pisanje imaju jasnu sliku o njemu. Činjenica je koju nikada neće moći pobiti u bilo kojem televizijskom ili novinarskom istupu, da je on bio “glasnogovornik” komunističke vlasti koju je svakodnevno kao njihov član za vrijeme bivše Jugoslavije u svojim kolumnama u “Večernjaku” podupirao, štitio i opravdavao čak i pred sami raspad bivše Jugoslavije. Poslije toga taj gorljivi patriot se izgubio! "

evo nasao se pametni @alternativac tu soli svima pamet i koji svicarcima pripisuje "vrhunsku reklamu za vrlo vrlo prosjecnu milku". daj ti meni alternativac objasni koji to konkretno svicarci i zasto, tako dobro reklamiraju NJEMACKI proizvod? moje je misljenje da je i okus cokolade osobna stvar pa ce tako nekome bolja biti milka a drugome austrijska zotter cokolada a trecem neka od svicarskih....

moraju izbjeci paniku, previse je toga u igri, previse ljudi. na radiju su kod nas u austriji atomski strucnjaci rekli da bi bilo vise posljedica (mrtvih, ozljedjenih itd) da se krene s evakuacijama nego ako ostanu trenutno u kucama. takodjer bi doslo do velikih prometnih zastoja sviju koji bi zeljeli npr. iz tokija (koji ima s predgradjima cak 30 milijuna stanovnika!!!) pobjeci i tako bi na cesti na otvorenom bili vise izlozeni radijaciji nego ovako zabarikadirani u svojim kucama. najgora je cinjenica da ovo nije gotovo. burza pada, industrija automobilska i radio (sony) stoji....ovo bi moglo dovesti do prave nove ekonomske svjetske krize.

Stavljam samo pitanje na debatu. Ako je u Japanu oko Nuklearke evakuirano sve u krugu 30 kilometara, znaci li to da ce se evakuirati cijeli Zagreb ukoliko u Nuklearki Krško dodje do havarije? Hrvatska je premalena da bi prezivjela slicno, nije li pametnije oslanjati se ipak na druge izvore energije nego riskirati katastrofu? Sto se uopce radi po ovom pitanju? Ok, Hrvatska je u sranju trenutno ali ne bi smjela izgubiti iz vida ovu potencijalnu opasnost.

kad jedem kod azijata, tocno znam koji je koristio glutamate a koji nije. zedjam jos i slijedeci dan a imam i neke od nize navedenih poteskoca. i kao sto sam napisala, prijateljici je bila oduzeta lijeva polovica lica kao da je imala slag. lijecnici su rekli da je mononatrijev glutamat jedina mogucnost jer slaga nije bilo a niti drugih mogucih oboljenja. E621 Mononatrijev glutaminat Pojačivač okusa, biljnog ili životinjskog podrijetla. Natrijeva sol glutaminske kiseline. Mononatrijev glutaminat nalazi se i u mesu ribe, mlijeku, rajčici, no tada ne stvara probleme, jer nije u slobodnom obliku. Kao aditiv koji može imati štetne posljedice dodaje se u hranu u konzervama i u mnoge pikantne namirnice, i to pod raznim imenima, a često kao"prirodna aroma". Učestala upotreba može uzrokovati napadaje glavobolje, mučnine, vrtoglavice, lupanja srca, depresije, tjeskobe, bolove u prsima, promjene raspoloženja, napetost, hiperaktivnost, nadutost, žeđ, hladan znoj, crvenilo lica. Postoje sumnje da izaziva alergijske reakcije, posebno kod astmatičara. Smatra se ekscitotoksinom - može potaknuti živčane stanice na odumiranje, što je uočeno i u pokusima s eksperimentalnim životinjama. Smatra se da velika količina mononatrij-glutaminata izaziva snažno pobuđivanje receptora živčanih stanica, što vodi do njihova uništenja. S tim je povezan i nastanak neurodegenerativnih bolesti (Alzheimerova, Parkinsonova, Huntingdonova). Posebno može biti štetan u kombinaciji s aditivima E626 do E635. Stoga ih proizvođači često razdvajaju, ne bi li barem na ambalaži učinili opasnost manje očitom. Zabranjen u dječjoj hrani. Vidi E620 - E265.